![]() ![]() Available ProductsĪRM previews are currently available for the following plug-ins / apps: They will run on Mac OS 10.9 or newer, with either an Intel or ARM processor. The previews are 64-bit Intel and ARM universal binaries. ![]() So if you are running a new Mac with an M1 processor, you can now choose to run our software natively on the processor (instead of going thru the translation layer called Rosetta 2). And the way I understand it the current Patchwork version won't load VST3 plugins - that's why BCA is doing an update to their plugin line to add VST3 capability.We are glad to announce that previews of our software are now available with native Apple Silicon ARM support! ![]() VST3 capability has nothing to do with how Patchwork works in PT as you're using the aax version of Patchwork and that's all PT sees. , or is this capability only possible with the upcoming VST3 Version of patchwork Q2 - Will the current VST2 Patchwork either "load / host" VST3 plug-ins into the current Patchwork VST2 version? With the current VST "2" version of patchwork (either in AAX, or the VST2 Patchwork Standalone). Q1 - How will the VST3 capability reflect to Pro Tools (AAX) ? This is great news, as this should give users more power with reduced latency when patchwork standalone is being used (especially when I host V.I's in a live situation ). With the upcoming VST3 capability, I understand (I think I do) thats VST3 is more CPU efficient which will make the Standalone version more CPU efficient. I also use Bluecat Patchwork it in standalone mode for live hosting of V.I's and adding FX (without the need for using a Daw) ![]() , or to even host a specific signal chain, I have Bluecat patchwork which I use In Pro Tools 12 (AAX) which I use to occasionally host VSTs within pro Tools. Congratulations Blue Cat Audio - this is great news! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |